Debate
Is the ‘Creative Class’ Necessarily
Urban? Putting the Creativity Thesis in the Context of Non-urbanised
Regions in Industrialised Nations
In this article Cali Nuur and Staffan Laestadius raise the notion
of creativity in the context of non-urbanised regions in industrialised
nations. They argue that in a world where urbanization is proceeding
faster than ever where traffic congestion is growing, where environmental
problems like smog and water pollution are significant in many of
our dynamic regions and where housing prices are rocketing, opportunities
may emerge for creative combinations of talented people and non-
or less- urbanized regions to develop their competitiveness. What
we assert is that there is variety of lifestyle-related activities
outside large urbanised centres which may attract talented people
who want to combine their professional and private lifestyles –
and this creates opportunities.
Nuur, Cali and Laestadius, Staffan; Is the
‘Creative Class’ Necessarily Urban? Putting the Creativity
Thesis in the Context of Non-urbanised Regions in Industrialised
Nations, Debate, June 2009, European Journal of Spatial Development.
URL:www.nordregio.se/EJSD/debate200906.pdf
The Politics of Gating
Gated residential developments, neighbourhoods
to which public access is restricted, continue to generate academic,
policymaker and public curiosity. In a recent paper in the EJSD
Tony Manzi and Bill Smith-Bowers (2006) attempt to provide what
they see as a more subtle approach to these developments, arguing,
that hostility to gated communities is misplaced on several grounds.
In a debate article Rowland Atkinson argue, in response, that there
are several problems with the positions they adopt, and that these
should be considered if we are to effectively discuss how planning
practice and housing systems should work with or against these new
trends in the built environment.
In this new debate article Zoltan Csefalvay argues that the examination
of gated communities requires freedom from the inherent bias of
the recently popular politics-driven approach. He suggests that
to understand gated communities we need to understand the market-driven
process approach as such we should concentrate on the rational and
fconomically rooted motivations of homeowners, developers, and local
governments. In other words he argues that the notion of gated communities
should be demystified.
Csefalvay, Zoltan: The demystification of gating,
Debate, February 2009, European Journal of Spatial Development.
URL: www.nordregio.se/EJSD/debate200902.pdf
Atkinson, Rowland: The politics of gating
(A response to Private Security and Public Space by Manzi and Smith-Bowers),
Debate, May 2008, European Journal of Spatial Development.
URL:www.nordregio.se/EJSD/debate080506.pdf
Bowers, Bill Smith and Manzi, Tony: Private Security and Public
Space: New Approaches to the Theory and Practice of Gated Communities.
17pp.
(Refereed Articles November 2006 - no 22) in
pdf
The emerging Norwegian municipal structure
Calls have been made for fewer regions in Norway.
Norway is currently divided into 19 counties and 434 municipalities.
The political and administrative structures at the local and regional
levels are currently the subject of some debate. In this debate
article by Prof. Jørgen Amdam, Institute of planning and
administration, Volda University College, Norway, the challenges
posed in respect of emerging changes in Norway’s municipal
and county structures are examined. Focus is placed on possible
alternatives and their potential consequences, each illustrated
by means of reference to specific cases of municipalities in Møre
and Romsdal County. It is suggested that so-called communicative
planning processes are needed to be implemented for a change ‘from
below’ to be successful.
Amdam, Jørgen: The emerging Norwegian municipal
structure. August 2007. 25pp. in
pdf
European spatial planning
Much of the European work undertaken on spatial
planning has been carried out in the context of intergovernmental
co-operation, which is not always promoted by the Commission. The
process and results of the ESPON programme can be understood in
the context of globalisation and the conflicting scenarios for European
integration. The most important question related to future co-operation
on European spatial planning, concerns the scientific quality of
the results however, not their alleged policy implications.
Contributions:
Bengs, Christer: ESPON in context. October 2006.
10 pp. in pdf
Prezioso, Maria :Why the ESPON Programme is concerned
more with ‘policy implications’ than with ‘good
science’. March 2007. 8 pp. in
pdf
Is there no future for planning in our
cities?
The recent focus on improved governance in cities
has raised some concerns about the role of
urban planning. Questions have been raised on whether good governance
is a substitute for
planning, and if it is adequate in itself to achieve sustainable
development. Is there no future,
then, for planning in our cities?
Contributions:
Narang, Shipra & Reutersward, Lars: Improved
governance and sustainable urban development
Strategic planning holds the key. April 2006.
11 pp. in pdf
What is the role/meaning of planning theory
today?
The planning context across Europe is changing
for a number of reasons. Firstly, given the increased level of competition
associated with the liberalisation of markets and globalisation
more generally, the continuing need for ever more productive investments
are accentuated. In this context, environmental standards are often
among the first casualties. Secondly, globalisation underpins the
need for high-quality environments and attractive localities for
consumption. Thirdly, globalisation causes the restructuring of
existing urban systems, which can have a dramatic impact on individual
localities.
Planning theory as pursued by the profession has
therefore to submit or adjust to whatever trends are currently prevailing,
or must stand up for matters that are considered essential, or is
often obliged to do both.The question therefore arises, in what
direction are we going, and what is the role/meaning of planning
theory today?
Contributions:
Bengs, Christer: Planning Theory for the naive?
July 2005. 10 pp. in
pdf
Sager, Tore: Communicative Planners as Naïve
Mandarins of the Neo-liberal State?
December 2005. 9 pp in
pdf
The ‘Third Report on Economic and
Social Cohesion’
was published by the European Commission on the 18th of February
2004. For the debate preceding publication, as well as the final
report follow
this link
The report is likely to have a central role in
shaping policy discussions on cohesion and regional development
related issues for the foreseeable future, not least because it
provides a blueprint for European cohesion policy after EU-enlargement
in May 2004 and for the next Structural Funds programming period
beyond 2006. It is also highly relevant to academic research in
this area, e.g. through the work undertaken within the
ESPON research framework
To highlight this important event we will have
a number of experts on regional policy and cohesion commenting on
the report, its findings and its academic relevance.
Contributions:
Bengs, Christer: Introduction to a discussion
on the third cohesion report: Policy-relevant research and research-relevant
policy. March 2004. 7
pp. in pdf
Faludi, Andreas: The Third Cohesion Report
and the European Spatial Development Perspective. March 2004.
2 pp. in pdf
Eskelinen, Heikki: Third report on economic
and social cohesion. March 2004. 2
pp. in pdf
Karppi, Ilari: The Social Aspects of Enlargement:
Reflections on the 2004 Cohesion Report. April 2004. 5
pp. in pdf
Books/Reports
PLANNING IN ICELAND
FROM THE SETTLEMENT TO PRESENT TIMES By
Trausti Valsson. Reykjavik 2003.
Read
more
|